1991 Audi S2 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 290 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | S2 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 286 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |