1991 Audi S2 vs. 2005 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2005 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 837 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lincoln Navigator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2005 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2005 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | S2 | Navigator |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 2257 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 106 L |
