1991 Audi S2 vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi S2 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S2 | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1253 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |