1991 Audi S2 vs. 2005 Saturn Relay
To start off, 2005 Saturn Relay is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn Relay is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Saturn Relay. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saturn Relay. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn Relay weights approximately 526 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Saturn Relay. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saturn Relay. (298 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saturn Relay.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2005 Saturn Relay | |
Make | Audi | Saturn |
Model | S2 | Relay |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 309 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1946 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |