1991 Audi S2 vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (257 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 119 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | S2 | S60 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1539 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |