1991 Audi S2 vs. 2006 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 236 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2006 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | S2 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
