1991 Audi S2 vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi S2 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi S2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Audi | Daewoo |
| Model | S2 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
