1991 Audi S2 vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2009 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | S2 | M3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |