1991 Audi S2 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S2 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |