1991 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 336 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | S2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
