1991 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | S2 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
