1991 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Kia Borrego
To start off, 2010 Kia Borrego is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Borrego is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Borrego (272 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Borrego should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Borrego. (267 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Borrego. 2010 Kia Borrego has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi S2 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi S2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Borrego will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2010 Kia Borrego | |
Make | Audi | Kia |
Model | S2 | Borrego |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |