1991 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2. 2010 Land Rover LR3 has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi S2 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi S2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover LR3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Audi | Land Rover |
| Model | S2 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
