1991 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi S2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi S2 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S2 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |