1991 Audi S2 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | S2 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
