1991 Audi S2 vs. 2012 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2012 Ford Mondeo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Ford Mondeo. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Mondeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 30 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Mondeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Mondeo. (220 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2012 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S2 | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |
