1991 Audi S2 vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi S2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 120 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Audi | Saab |
Model | S2 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1540 kg |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |