1991 Audi S2 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 438 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi S2 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi S2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | S2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.3 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
