1991 Audi S2 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 60 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | S2 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
