1991 Auverland A3 vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1991 Auverland A3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1991 Auverland A3. (63 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1991 Auverland A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 34 kg more than 1991 Auverland A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Auverland A3. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Auverland A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Auverland A3 | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Auverland | Ford |
| Model | A3 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
