1991 BMW 316 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 BMW 316 (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 BMW 316 (151 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1991 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1991 BMW 316 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | BMW | Smart |
Model | 316 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 81.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 33 L |