1991 BMW 320 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1991 BMW 320. (149 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1991 BMW 320.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 BMW 320. (190 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1991 BMW 320 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 320 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 393 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 78 L |