1991 BMW M12 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1991 BMW M12 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 BMW M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 BMW M12 (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 BMW M12 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 BMW M12 (450 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 1991 BMW M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1991 BMW M12 has manual transmission. 1991 BMW M12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 BMW M12 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | M12 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 4343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
