1991 BMW M12 vs. 1998 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Telstar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW M12 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 BMW M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 BMW M12 (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1998 Ford Telstar. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 BMW M12 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Telstar.
Because 1991 BMW M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 BMW M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 BMW M12 (450 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Telstar. (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1991 BMW M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1991 BMW M12 | 1998 Ford Telstar | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M12 | Telstar |
Year Released | 1991 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4988 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1400 mm |