1991 BMW M12 vs. 2002 Honda Logo
To start off, 2002 Honda Logo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW M12 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 BMW M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 BMW M12 (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2002 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 BMW M12 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Logo.
Because 1991 BMW M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 BMW M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 BMW M12 (450 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 BMW M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 BMW M12 | 2002 Honda Logo | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | M12 | Logo |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2370 mm |
