1991 BMW M12 vs. 2005 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW M12 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 547 more horse power than 1991 BMW M12. (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1991 BMW M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 BMW M12. (450 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 BMW M12.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 BMW M12 | 2005 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | BMW | Lotec |
| Model | M12 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1150 mm |
