1991 BMW Z1 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1991 BMW Z1 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 BMW Z1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 76 kg more than 1991 BMW Z1.
Because 1991 BMW Z1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 BMW Z1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 BMW Z1 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Z1 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |