1991 BMW Z1 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 BMW Z1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 BMW Z1 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1991 BMW Z1. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 BMW Z1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 BMW Z1 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 BMW Z1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 BMW Z1. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 BMW Z1.
Compare all specifications:
1991 BMW Z1 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z1 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3200 mm |