1991 Buick Regal vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Buick Regal | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | Regal | XJ |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 297 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3040 mm |