1991 Cadillac Allante vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Cadillac Allante (168 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Cadillac Allante weights approximately 850 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1991 Cadillac Allante has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Cadillac Allante will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: