1991 Caterham Super 7 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1991 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1991 Caterham Super 7. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1991 Caterham Super 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 890 kg more than 1991 Caterham Super 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Caterham Super 7 | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
Model | Super 7 | E Type |
Year Released | 1991 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 84 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 510 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 63 L |