1991 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Blazer (158 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.
Because 1991 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Accord (350 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chevrolet Blazer. (312 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chevrolet Blazer. 2012 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 1991 Chevrolet Blazer has manual transmission. 1991 Chevrolet Blazer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Honda Accord | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Blazer | Accord |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |