1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Volvo 260

To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 260 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 50 kg more than 1976 Volvo 260.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Chevrolet Camaro 1976 Volvo 260
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Camaro 260
Year Released 1991 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 140 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 73 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2660 mm