1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Camaro | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Camaro | Celica |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2640 mm |
