1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,001 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 720 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (387 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Camaro | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Camaro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5001 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |
