1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 30 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
Model | Camaro | Nea |
Year Released | 1991 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2590 mm |