1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1991 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Integra |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |