1991 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (387 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | E-350 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5001 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 57 L |