1991 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Caprice (406 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1991 Chevrolet Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Caprice | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Caprice | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 406 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 1867 mm |
