1991 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | Cavalier | RM A |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2870 mm |
