1991 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier (94 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier (163 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Cavalier | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
