1991 Chevrolet Nova vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Nova is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Nova (200 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Nova should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 668 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Nova (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chevrolet Nova | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Nova | 102 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1438 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2160 mm |
