1991 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1991 Chevrolet Nova. (200 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chevrolet Nova (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chevrolet Nova | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Nova | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.5 mm | 84.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3010 mm |