1991 Chrysler ES vs. 1962 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 1991 Chrysler ES is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Zephyr (103 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 34 kg more than 1991 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Zephyr (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1962 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler ES | 1962 Ford Zephyr | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ES | Zephyr |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
