1991 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1991 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler ES | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | ES | XK8 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2590 mm |
