1991 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler ES weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 6 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2488 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |