1991 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,393 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler ES weights approximately 170 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Because 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler ES | 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | ES | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |