1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1991 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Chrysler | ZAZ |
| Model | Le Baron | 966 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2170 mm |
