1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1998 Honda S2000
To start off, 1998 Honda S2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda S2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda S2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 1998 Honda S2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | Le Baron | S2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |
