1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Le Baron | Clio |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |
